Research / Structure / Validation / 02
Research without theater
Plan interviews, observation, surveys, and analytics around decisions you genuinely need to make.
Before you begin
By the end, you can…
- Ask for behavior rather than predictions
- Select a method that fits the decision
- Separate evidence from interpretation
01 / Understand
Memory beats speculation
People are poor predictors of what they will do, especially when they want to be helpful. Ask for the last real occasion: what triggered it, what happened next, what tools were involved, and where the work became difficult.
An interview reveals meaning and language. Observation reveals workarounds and context. A survey estimates a known pattern. Analytics show what happened but rarely why. Combine methods only when each closes a real evidence gap.
02 / Apply
Synthesis is disciplined compression
Keep raw observations, participant words, interpretations, and recommendations distinct. Affinity mapping helps reveal repeated behavior, but frequency alone does not determine importance.
A finding should connect evidence to an implication: what was observed, why it matters, who it affects, and what decision it informs. Preserve contradictions instead of smoothing them away.
03 / Make
Your studio task
Make — Run three short interviews using behavior-first questions, then affinity-map the evidence.
- Write five behavior-first interview questions.
- Run three short conversations or observations.
- Capture facts and quotes separately from interpretations.
- Create three findings, each with evidence and a decision implication.
Findings distinguish observed patterns, quotes, assumptions, and unanswered questions.
04 / Check